All Felony and Misdemeanor Cases
Commonwealth v. Vasquez: 2nd offense DUI case. All evidence suppressed because the judge found that the officer did not have probable cause to stop client’s vehicle. Client’s vehicle drifted outside of lane momentarily. Charges dropped.
Commonwealth v. Beaver: 3rd offense DUI within 10 years. Client pled guilty and received 1 year of house arrest, rather than the mandatory 1 year prison sentence.
Commonwealth v. Scollen: DUI charges dismissed after trial by judge. Client was sitting behind the wheel of a running vehicle. Judge found that the state did not prove client was “driving, operating or in actual physical control” of her vehicle and dismissed case.
Commonwealth v. Yerka: 2nd offense DUI. Found not guilty after trial by judge. State did not prove client was in “actual physical control” of the vehicle.
Commonwealth v. Lenig: 2nd offense DUI. Defendant found asleep behind the wheel of a running vehicle in the parking lot of a lodge that served alcohol. Client was found not guilty by judge because state did not prove that client drove, operated or was in actual physical control of his vehicle.
Commonwealth v. Berndlmaier: 2nd offense DUI. Client was walking up her driveway when police arrived. Case dismissed by District Justice because no proof the defendant operated vehicle while under the influence. Case was refiled by Commonwealth and subsequently dismissed again.
Commonwealth v. Frawley: 2nd offense DUI. Client given house arrest, permitted to work by Judge.
Commonwealth v. Malave: Client changing tire when police arrived. Case was dismissed at Preliminary Hearing because Commonwealth could not prove client drove the vehicle to that location.
Commonwealth v. Siano: 3rd offense DUI within 10 years. Client given 1 year of house arrest by Judge instead of 1 year in prison.
Commonwealth v. Malave: DUI case dismissed when judge found client did not drive vehicle when client was found outside of car changing tire.
Represented over 1,000 clients who were placed into the ARD program for first time offenders. Charges dismissed after completion of safe driving classes, fines and informal probation.
Commonwealth v. Melching: Client found not guilty by jury of Aggravated Assault on county Deputy Sheriff.
Commonwealth v. Feldman (aka “Bucks County Bread Squeezer”): Client was originally charged with Felony criminal mischief for allegedly destroying thousands of dollars of bread and cookies in a supermarket in Yardley, PA. Client was found not guilty by jury of all criminal charges, sentenced by the judge for summary violation to pay $500.00 fine. Received worldwide coverage from the Associated Press and Newsweek Magazine and story was on all 4 local news stations, CNN and the Court Channel.
Commonwealth v. Vasquez: 2nd offense DUI case. All evidence suppressed because the judge found that the officer did not have probable cause to stop client’s vehicle. Charges dropped.
Contact Us
Call 215-660-4515
to be connected to any of our 7 offices
Click on an office location for a detailed map. Additional offices located in Doylestown and Hatboro.
Commonwealth v. Beaver: 3rd offense DUI within 10 years. Client pled guilty and received 1 year of house arrest, rather than the mandatory 1 year prison sentence.
Commonwealth v. Martin: Client charged with speeding 110 mph on I-95. The police officer agreed to drop the speed to 65 mph in 55 mph zone and client was able to keep his driver’s license.
Commonwealth v. Scollen: DUI charges dismissed after trial by judge. Judge found that the state did not prove client was “driving, operating or in actual physical control” of her vehicle.
Commonwealth v. Decker: Felony criminal trespass charged alleging that client broke into ex-girlfriend’s house. Found not guilty of all charges after trial by judge.
Commonwealth v. Yerka: 2nd offense DUI. Found not guilty after trial by judge. State did not prove client was the operator of the vehicle.
Commonwealth v. Lenig: 2nd offense DUI. Defendant found asleep in his vehicle. Client was found not guilty by judge because state did not prove that client drove, operated or was in actual physical control of his vehicle.
“Call us for a free consultation with one of our highly experienced defense attorneys.”
